Legal Opinion

Stevenson v. Colgan

California Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1891No. 14605PublishedCited by 79 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated, in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandamus to be directed to the defendant as state con*650troller, commanding him to draw a warrant on the state treasurer for the sum of $125, to which amount petitioner claims' he is entitled by virtue of the provisions of an act of the legislature approved March 31, 1891. The act is entitled “An act for the relief of Jonathan D. Stevenson, and to appropriate money therefor,” and so far as necessary to be stated here, it is as follows: —

“Sec. 1. The sum of $125 per month, payable monthly, for the ¡period of twenty-one months, is hereby appropriated out of any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rumsey v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Lusher v. ScitesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1870
  3. De Camp v. EvelandNew York Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Hovey v. FosterIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Woodall v. DarstWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. People Ex Rel. Chapman v. Sacramento Drainage Dist.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Matter of Stubbe v. . AdamsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Lelande v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API