Legal Opinion

Lundberg v. County of Alameda

California Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1956No. S. F. 19026PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Plaintiff, a citizen resident of defendant county and a taxpayer therein, brought this suit to challenge the legality of a tax exemption. Such actions are authorized by section 526a of the Code of Civil Procedure,1 (cf. Delaney v. Lowery, 25 Cal.2d 561 [154 P.2d 674]) and, being in aid of the collection of taxes, are distinguishable from cases in which a party seeking to avoid taxation was denied mandamus on the ground that an action for refund of illegally collected taxes constituted an adequate remedy at law. (See Security-First Nat. Bank v. Board of Supervisors, 35 Cal.2d 323 [217 P.2d…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Everson v. Board of Ed. of EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Zorach v. ClausonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. City of San Francisco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Hill School Tax Exemption CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Delaney v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. In Re CreglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Methodist Hosp. of Sacramento v. SaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. California Housing Finance Agency v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API