Legal Opinion

Corning Hospital District v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1962No. Sac. 7370PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Petitioner, a hospital district in Tehama County, seeks a writ of prohibition to prevent further proceedings in an action for personal injuries brought against it by Louisa and Richard Muskopf. The right to this relief depends upon the validity and effect of chapter 1404 of the 1961 statutes, which became effective September 15 of that year. The district asserts that by reason of this legislation it is entitled to rely on the doctrine of governmental immunity from tort liability as that doctrine existed prior to our decision in Muskopf v. Corning Hospital Dist., 55 Cal.2d 211 [11 Cal.Rptr.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Edgar A. Levy Leasing Co. v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Spanel v. Mounds View School District No. 621Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. Jones v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API