Legal Opinion

Patrick v. Riley

California Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1930No. Docket No. S.F. 13708PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WASTE, C. J.—

This is an original application for a writ of mandamus to be directed to the respondent as state controller commanding him to 'draw two warrants on the state treasurer in the respective sums of $8.46 and $38.28, to which amounts petitioner claims he is entitled by virtue of the. provisions of an act of the legislature referred to as the “Bovine Tuberculosis Law.” (Stats. 1929, chap. 829, p. 1750.)

Section 10 of the above-entitled act authorizes and empowers the director of agriculture to establish and maintain tuberculosis control areas within the state wherein all dairy animals…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Matter of Application of MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Conlin v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Veterans' Welfare Board v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. County of Alameda v. JanssenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Redevelopment Agency v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. City of Miami Beach v. WiesenSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  5. Pacific Coast Dairy v. Police CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API