Legal Opinion

State v. Briggs

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 15, 1901No. Nos. 12,731, 12,732—(18,19)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Defendant was convicted in the district court for Hennepin county, McGee, J., upon two indictments charging him with keeping a gambling device. From each of the judgments of conviction, defendant appealed. Judgment in case 12,732 affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

The defendant was found guilty in each of these cases, in the district court for the county of Hennepin, upon indictments charging him with keeping a gambling device. Judgment was entered upon the verdict in each case, imposing upon him the maximum punishment, — a fine of $200 and imprisonment in the work house for the term of six months; the sentences to be cumulative. A motion was made and denied in each case for a new trial, and the defendant appealed from the judgments. The questions presented for consideration are substantially the same in each case, except as hereinafter stated. To…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  2. State v. HennSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  3. State v. GraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. OrecchioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. State v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. Governing Board v. PannillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API