State v. Orecchio
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Jacobs, J.
The Appellate Division, without dissent, directed that the defendant be granted a new trial because of the many legal errors during his first trial which resulted in judgment of conviction. See 27 N. J. Super. 484 (1953). We granted certification on the State’s application. See 14 N. J. 352 (1954).
The sound administration of criminal justice in our democracy requires that both the end and the means be just. The accused, no matter how abhorrent the offense charged nor how seemingly evident the guilt, is entitled to a fair trial surrounded by…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Viereck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Weiler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Delaney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by149 opinions
- State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- State v. DiFriscoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- State v. FrostSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- State v. TimmendequasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.