Legal Opinion

State v. Orecchio

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 28, 1954PublishedCited by 149 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Jacobs, J.

The Appellate Division, without dissent, directed that the defendant be granted a new trial because of the many legal errors during his first trial which resulted in judgment of conviction. See 27 N. J. Super. 484 (1953). We granted certification on the State’s application. See 14 N. J. 352 (1954).

The sound administration of criminal justice in our democracy requires that both the end and the means be just. The accused, no matter how abhorrent the offense charged nor how seemingly evident the guilt, is entitled to a fair trial surrounded by…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Viereck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Weiler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Delaney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by149 opinions

  1. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  2. State v. DiFriscoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  3. State v. FrostSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  4. State v. TimmendequasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  5. State v. HarveySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997

144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API