State v. Smith
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was convicted in the district court for Ramsey county, Brill, J., of the crime of swindling. At his request the court reported the case and certified to the supreme court for its determination the question stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Defendant was convicted in the district court of Ramsey county, under G-. S. 1894, § 6595, of the crime of swindling; and the cause is certified to this court to determine the question, is the evidence sufficient to make out an offense of swindling, within the meaning of the statute? The statute is as follows: '
“Whoever, by the means of three-card monte, so called, or of any other form or device, sleight of hand or other means whatever, by use of cards or instruments of like character, or by any other instrument, trick, or device, obtains from another person any money or other property of any…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morton v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
- Maxwell v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. FrigerioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- VanEyck v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Meriwether v. Publishers: George Knapp & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- State v. WellsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- State v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- State v. YurkiewiczSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.