State v. Gray
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Olmsted county, Start, J., presiding, where defendant was convicted of the crime of swindling by means of three-card monte.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
This defendant, John Gray, and one John Doe, were jointly indicted under Gen. St. 1878, c. 99, § 15, which reads as follows: “Whoever, by the means of three-card monte, so called, or of any other form or device, sleight of hand, or other means whatever, by use of cards or instruments of like character, obtains from another person any money or other property of any description, shall be deemed guilty of the crime of swindling, and shall, on conviction thereof, be punished,” etc. “All persons.aiding, encouraging, advising, or confederating with * * * any such person or'persons, or in any manner…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. TaylorNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- People v. . CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Wingard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
- Byrne v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Goddard v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- State v. TerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- State v. McGinnisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.