Legal Opinion

State v. Henn

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 28, 1888PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for McLeod county, Edson, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Defendant was indicted, under section 415 of the Penal Code, for the crime of grand larceny in the second degree. The allegations of the indictment are that the defendant wilfully, maliciously, and feloniously, by reason of a false token and writing, to wit, a false and forged elevator ticket, which had theretofore been made by the defendant, (and which is set out in the indictment according to its tenor,) obtained of Sylvester Strong and H. Miller the sum of $25.83 in money, (described,) of the value of $25.83, *465and' the property of Strong and Miller, and appropriated the same to his own use.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. . DumarNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. People v. . DimickNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Critchfield v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  3. State v. OwensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  5. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API