Legal Opinion
State v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 9, 1898No. Nos. 11,196-(27)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Smith, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The defendants Wilson and Carlson were indicted, tried, and convicted,’ under G. S. 1894, § 6595, of the crime of ‘ swindling. The statute referred to reads in part as follows:
“Whoever by means of three-card monte, so called, or of any other form or device, sleight of hand or other means whatever, by use of cards or instruments of like character, or by any other instru*524merit, trick, or device, obtains from another person any money or other property of any description, shall be deemed guilty of the crime' of swindling.”
The evidence tends to prove substantially the following state of facts: The…
2Cited by16 opinions
- State v. DurnamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- State v. MonroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- State v. AmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- State v. FitchetteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- People v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.