Legal Opinion
Kimes v. Davidson Investment Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 21, 1929No. Docket No. 3897PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The plaintiff had judgment against the defendants for the principal sum of $3,000 and interest in the sum of $630, upon an action instituted to compel payment of the reasonable value of work and labor performed by the assignor of the plaintiff at the instance and request of the defendants. The complaint is in two counts, but as a nonsuit was granted as to the first count it is only necessary to consider the allegations of the second. The allegations of the second count upon which judgment was rendered read as follows:
“That within four years last past, defendants became indebted to Pranz…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brown v. Crown Gold Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Nylund v. MadsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- American-Hawaiian Engineering & Construction Co. v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Grass v. Rindge Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Clark v. Conley School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
3Cited by13 opinions
- Miller v. McLaglenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Oliver v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Anselmo v. SebastianiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Caminetti v. Prudence Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Combs v. EberhardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.