Legal Opinion
Caminetti v. Prudence Mutual Life Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 17, 1944No. Civ. No. 13918PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, J. pro tem.
Appellant, as Insurance Commissioner of the State of California, obtained from the Superior Court of Sacramento County an order under section 1011 of the Insurance Code appointing him as conservator of the business of the respondent, Prudence Mutual Life Insurance Association, and pursuant to this order took over its property and business. The respondent is a corporation organized to do life insurance business on the mutual benefit assessment plan. As soon as this order was made, the proceeding was transferred to Los Angeles County. Later, on application of respondent, a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Caminetti v. Imperial Mutual Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Bassett v. FairchildCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Nylund v. MadsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Lundberg v. KatzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Angelus Securities Corp. v. BallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Remillard Brick Co. v. Remillard-Dandini Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Estate of ReinhertzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Matter of Integrity Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Langer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
- Wilson v. Red Bluff Daily NewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.