American-Hawaiian Engineering & Construction Co. v. Butler
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Geo. A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
In this opinion we shall refer to Emma G. Butler as respondent, since the defendant in the cross-complaint has no interest in the proceedings here. The plaintiff has appealed on the judgment-roll from a judgment in its favor. It makes two contentions: “First: The judgment should be increased by the amount of $7,170, the sum expended by appellant in the hire of superintendents, foremen and watchmen in the construction of the building mentioned in this action; and Second: It should be increased by the amount of legal, interest on a part of its claim from the time of filing the complaint in this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Coburn v. GoodallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Easterbrook v. FarquharsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Brady v. WilcoxsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Erickson v. Stockton & Tuolumne Cty. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fawcett v. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
- Hanlon Drydock & Shipbuilding Co. v. G. W. McNear, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Curtin v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Connette v. WrightSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- Continental Rubber Works v. BernsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.