Brown v. Crown Gold Milling Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This action was brought by plaintiff to recover from defendant the reasonable value of certain services performed for it from August 1, 1900, to December 14, 1901.
The case was tried before a jury, a verdict rendered for plaintiff for $2,955, and from the judgment entered thereon defendant appeals, the grounds urged for a reversal being presented upon a bill of exceptions accompanying the appeal from the judgment..
At the close of plaintiff’s case defendant moved for a non-suit, which was denied. This is the first error assigned, and in order to properly discuss it it is necessary to state…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Castagnino v. BallettaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Crowley v. Genesee Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Gribble v. Columbus Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Wilkins v. StidgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Cowan v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Sessions v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Bank of California v. ConnollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Coats v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Boehm v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Oliver v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.