Maryland Casualty Co. v. Reeder
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, Acting P. J.
The purchasers of condominium units, their homeowners association, an individual developer and the entities which participated in the construction and sale of the condominium project appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of a liability insurer. We reverse because we find the exclusions the insurance company relies upon do not apply as a matter of law to the claims made against the insureds.
Factual and Procedural Summary
Although the record in this case is voluminous, it does not definitively describe the relationship between the various entities who…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hauenstein v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercuy Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Hamilton Die Cast, Inc. v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. CossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Indiana Insurance v. DeZuttiIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Anthem Electronics, Inc. v. Pacific Employers Insurance Company, a California Corporation Federal Insurance Company, an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Auto-Owners Insurance v. Home Pride Companies, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.