Legal Opinion

Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 3, 2010No. 1 CA-CV 08-0802PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHNSEN, Judge.

¶ 1 Soil settlement caused cracks and other damage to 50 new homes in north Scottsdale. Prompted by complaints from customers to whom it had sold the homes, the developer, Desert Mountain Properties Limited Partnership, paid an average of $200,000 per home to have the soil issues corrected and the damage repaired. Desert Mountain then sought reimbursement from its insurer. We hold in this appeal that commercial general liability policies issued by Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company covered the expenses Desert Mountain incurred in repairing property damage resulting…

2Cases cited91 opinions

  1. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Lamar Homes, Inc. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2007
  5. American Family Mutual Insurance v. American Girl, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Murphy Farrell Development, LLLP v. SourantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. City Center Executive Plaza, LLC v. JantzenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  3. Nucor Corp. v. Employers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. Temple v. Hartford InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2014
  5. Teufel v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 2018

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API