Hauenstein v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
Plaintiffs appeal from a declaratory judgment for the defendant.
Plaintiffs, as copartners doing business as The Hauenstein Company, were distributors of a new type of plaster known as Softone Acoustical Plaster. At all times herein plaintiffs were covered against liability for accidental property damage by an insurance contract with the defendant insurance company under which contract the defendant-insurer agreed:
“To Pay any loss by reason of the liability imposed by law or contract upon the Insured for damages because of injury to or destruction of property, including the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tomlyanovich v. TomlyanovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Anderson v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Henderson v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Zindell v. Central Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Heath v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by168 opinions
- Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercuy Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Hogan v. Midland National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Sheets v. Brethren Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Marshall Produce Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.