Legal Opinion

Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercuy Indemnity Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1959No. Sac. 6914PublishedCited by 163 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant in an action to recover on an insurance policy issued by defendant to California Aluminum Products, Inc., hereinafter referred to as Aluminum Products.

Plaintiff, a building contractor, ordered 760 aluminum doors, door jambs, and attached hardware from Aluminum Products in November, 1950. The doors were to be used in 76 houses being constructed by plaintiff in the cities of Napa and Fairfield. The deliveries of the doors occurred from December, 1950, to February, 1951. The doors were kept in storage for some time, and plaintiff began to install…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hauenstein v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Ritchie v. Anchor Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Rock v. Travelers' Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Zuckerman v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Richards v. Travelers Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by163 opinions

  1. Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Thomas Francis v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  3. Sentinel Insurance Co. v. First Insurance Co. of Hawai'i, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Hogan v. Midland National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Samson v. Transamerica InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API