Legal Opinion

Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1995No. S026013PublishedCited by 292 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, C. J.

In Prudential-LMI Com. Insurance v. Superior Court (1990) 51 Cal.3d 674 [274 Cal.Rptr. 387, 798 P.2d 1230] (Prudential-LMI), we examined the issue of allocation of indemnity among insurers in a first party property insurance case, where a loss had occurred over several policy periods but was not discovered until several years after it commenced. We found the “manifestation of loss rule” applicable, holding that the insurer insuring the property at the time appreciable property damage becomes manifest is solely responsible for indemnifying the insured once coverage is…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by292 opinions

  1. Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000

287 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API