Legal Opinion
Hamilton Die Cast, Inc. v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 3, 1975No. 74-1077PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.
In November 1972, plaintiff brought this declaratory judgment action seeking a determination of its rights under a contract of insurance issued by defendant which insured plaintiff against its liability for personal injuries and property damage caused by an “occurrence.” In November 1971, Midland Sporting Goods (“Midland”) sued plaintiff, which had agreed to manufacture for Midland all of its requirements of aluminum die cast tennis rackets. 1 Midland claimed that the tennis racket frames were to be of good and merchantable quality and “porosity and oxide free, of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Case Foundation Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Gulf Insurance Company v. Parker Products, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1973
- Maurice Pincoffs Company v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, American Home Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Northern Grain CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Parker Products, Inc. v. Gulf Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
3Cited by94 opinions
- Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Sherwin S. Stern v. United States Gypsum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Sterilite Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.