Legal Opinion
In re Marvin M.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 5, 1998No. AC 16942PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
The respondents appeal from the judgment of the trial court terminating their parental rights as to their children, Marvin and David. On appeal, the respondents claim that the trial court improperly (1) granted the motion by the petitioner, the department *565of children and families (department), to disclose the respondents’ medical records from substance abuse treatment facilities and psychiatric treatment facilities, and permitted subsequent testimony with regard to such records in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 290dd-2 and its applicable regulations, and in violation of General…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Tomlinson v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Primerica v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Ardmare Construction Co. v. FreedmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re Eden F.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- In re Hector L.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- In re Shyliesh H.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- In re Amber B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- In re Mariah S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.