Legal Opinion

Santosky v. Kramer

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 22, 1982No. 80-5889PublishedCited by 5,921 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun

Under New York law, the State may terminate, over parental objection, the rights of parents in their natural child upon a finding that the child is “permanently neglected.” N.Y. Soc. Serv. Law §§384 — b.4.(d), 384-b.7.(a) (McKinney Supp. 1981-1982) (Soc. Serv. Law). The New York Family Court Act § 622 (McKinney 1975 and Supp. 1981-1982) (Fam. Ct. Act) requires that only a “fair preponderance of the evidence” support that finding. Thus, in New York, the factual certainty required to extinguish the parent-child relationship is no greater than that necessary to award money damages in an ordinary…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5,921 opinions

  1. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

5,916 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API