Legal Opinion
In re Shyliesh H.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 21, 1999No. AC 19433PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The respondent father1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights with respect to his minor daughter, Shyliesh H. On appeal, the respondent claims that the trial court improperly (1) found that he had failed to achieve *169sufficient personal rehabilitation within the meaning of General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 17a-112 (c) (3) (B),2 (2) found that termination of his parental lights was in the best interest of Shyliesh, (3) terminated his parental rights because § 17a-112 (c) (3) (B) is unconstitutionally vague on its face and as applied to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. IndrisanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- In re Eden F.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- In Re Juvenile Appeal (84-3)Connecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- State v. AnonymousSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. BuhlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- In re Daniel C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- In re Sarah Ann K.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- In re Shane P.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- In re Shane P.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.