Legal Opinion

In re Amber B.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 7, 2000No. AC 19700PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*778 Opinion

MIHALAKOS, J.

The respondent father1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights with respect to his daughter pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 17a-112 (c) (3) (B).2 The respondent claims that the court improperly (1) found that he failed to achieve sufficient personal rehabilitation, (2) found that the department of children and families (department) used reasonable efforts to reunite the child with him, (3) shifted the burden of proof to him as to whether reasonable efforts were made to reunify him with the child by allowing the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In re Migdalia M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  2. In re Eden F.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. In re Romance M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. In re Christina V.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  5. In re Eden F.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In re Stanley D.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. People v. PoindexterColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. In re Jennifer W.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. Hunter Ridge, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
  5. In Re Amber S., (June 4, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API