Legal Opinion

In re Mariah S.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 26, 2000No. AC 20365PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPEAR, J.

The respondent mother appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating her parental rights with respect to her minor child, M.1 She claims that the court improperly found that (1) the department of children and families (department) made reasonable efforts at reunification, (2) she failed to achieve a sufficient level of personal rehabilitation and (3) there was no ongoing parent-child relationship. The respondent further claims that her federal and state constitutional *250rights were violated because (1) the department’s efforts at reunification were not reasonable and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In re Valerie D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. In re Eden F.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. In re TabithaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  4. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. In re Danuael D.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In re Daniel C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. In re Victoria B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. In re Sheena I.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. In re Alejandro L.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. In re Ashley M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API