Legal Opinion

Ardmare Construction Co. v. Freedman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 15, 1983No. 12124PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.

In a judgment rendered from the bench,1 the trial judge granted the plaintiffs request for mandamus, and ordered the commissioner of administrative services to award a contract for the repair of walls and walks at the community correctional center in Bridge*498port to the plaintiff. The defendants2 have appealed maintaining that an order of mandamus was improper because (1) the commissioner performs a discretionary duty when awarding a public work contract; (2) the plaintiff had an adequate remedy at law; and (3) the plaintiffs bid was incomplete, requiring the commissioner to reject the bid…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. John H. Shaffer, Administrator (Acting) of the Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  2. Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. John W. Merriam v. Robert L. Kunzig, Administrator, General Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  5. B.K. Instrument, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Tomlinson v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc. v. Town of BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. Rose v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API