Legal Opinion
In re Hector L.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 18, 1999No. AC 18632PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER,
J. The respondent father1 appeals from the judgments of the trial court terminating his parental *361rights with respect to his four children. On appeal, the respondent claims that the trial court improperly (1) terminated his parental rights on the statutory ground of failure to achieve personal rehabilitation, (2) reviewed the evidence under the “clear and convincing evidence” standard, rather than the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard, (3) found that there was no ongoing relationship between the respondent and his two youngest children because the trial court did not apply…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In re Luis C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- In re Michael M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Griffin v. Nationwide Moving & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- In re Daniel C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- In re Antonio M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- In re Stanley D.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- In re Jermaine S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. GuitardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.