Legal Opinion

State v. Rangeloff

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1998No. Criminal 980019PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Brook Rangeloff appeals from a criminal judgment entered following a conditional plea of guilty to the charge of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. Rangeloffs conviction stems from evidence seized during the search of three mobile homes on November 28, 1995. Ran-geloff entered his guilty plea after the trial court denied both a request for a Franks 1 hearing and a motion to suppress evidence. We affirm the trial court’s judgment, because Rangeloff failed to make a substantial preliminary showing of a false statement, and because there was…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. James Edward Colkley, United States of America v. Jamison Henry JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. DaleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Royal W. Hadfield, Jr., United States of America v. Helen HadfieldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. City of Fairgo v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. ThielingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. KieperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. RothNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. BallwegNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. EbelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API