Legal Opinion

City of Fairgo v. Thompson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1994No. Cr. 940008, 940009, 940010 to 940012PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

In City of Fargo v. Stutlien, 505 N.W.2d 738 (N.D.1993), we held illegal a court-ordered procedure for mandatory minimum pe*580riods of detention for all driving under the influence and actual physical control arres-tees. But we reversed the dismissal of criminal prosecutions against the defendants charged in those cases, concluding absent “evidence that these minimum periods of detention actually prejudiced the defendants’ right to present a defense and have a fair trial, the trial court’s dismissal of the charges was speculative and premature.” Stutlien at 746. After separate…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Kuntz v. State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. DietzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Bickler v. North Dakota State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. State v. DeCoteauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. GreggNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. GlaesmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. KitchenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. GrafNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API