Legal Opinion

State v. Kieper

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 2008No. 20070100PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Jarrett Kieper appeals from a criminal judgment entered upon his conditional guilty plea. We conclude the issuance of the search warrant was not supported by probable cause, and the district court erred in denying Kieper’s motion to suppress the evidence seized as a result of the illegal search. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I

[¶ 2] On July 12, 2006, law enforcement applied for a search warrant for Kieper’s residence from a district court judge, and Special Agent Ben Leingang of the North Dakota Bureau of Criminal Investigations testified in support of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. DamronNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. ThielingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. RangeloffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. BlurtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. GrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. HollyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. AtkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. GillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API