State v. Roth
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Todd Roth appeals the criminal judgment and the trial court’s decision denying his motion to suppress evidence seized during a search of his residence. The trial court found probable cause did not support a no-knock provision in the authorized search warrant, but the officers acted reasonably when they executed the search warrant without utilizing the no-knock provision. Roth contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because probable cause did not exist, the trial court improperly relied on a confidential informant’s tip, and the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Steven Lester Marts Pamela Sue MartsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. SchmalzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Roth v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. SkarsgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. UtvickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. HollyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.