Legal Opinion

State v. Roth

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2004No. 20030102PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Todd Roth appeals the criminal judgment and the trial court’s decision denying his motion to suppress evidence seized during a search of his residence. The trial court found probable cause did not support a no-knock provision in the authorized search warrant, but the officers acted reasonably when they executed the search warrant without utilizing the no-knock provision. Roth contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because probable cause did not exist, the trial court improperly relied on a confidential informant’s tip, and the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. Steven Lester Marts Pamela Sue MartsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  5. State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. SchmalzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Roth v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. SkarsgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. UtvickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. HollyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API