Legal Opinion

State v. Ebel

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 2006No. 20050440—20050443PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Todd Ebel appeals from a criminal judgment and commitment entered upon his conditional guilty plea to one count of possession of a controlled substance and two counts of possession of drug paraphernalia. We conclude probable cause existed to support the issuance of the search warrant and the district court did not err in denying Ebel a hearing under Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978).

I

[¶ 2] On December 29, 2004, Police Officer Dustin Hill contacted a district court judge via telephone to obtain a search warrant for Ebel’s residence…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. Ronald Foster JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. City of Fairgo v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. WinklerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. KieperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Roth v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. HollyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. City of Dickinson v. HewsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. LundeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API