Legal Opinion

State v. Thieling

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2000No. 990383PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Kathy Thieling appeals from a district court order denying her motion to suppress evidence. We conclude the magistrate judge did not have a substantial basis to determine there was probable cause to believe drugs or contraband would be found in Thieling’s home. We thus hold the district court erred in denying Thieling’s motion to suppress evidence resulting from the illegal search. We reverse and remand.

I

[¶ 2] In September 1999, a special agent for the North Dakota Bureau of Criminal Investigations applied to a magistrate judge for a warrant to search the home of Kathy…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. Angelo IngraoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. State v. MischeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. United States v. Odell Sumpter, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State v. SchmalzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. KieperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. RothNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. BallwegNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. EbelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API