Legal Opinion
United States v. Royal W. Hadfield, Jr., United States of America v. Helen Hadfield
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 31, 1990No. 89-2169, 89-2170PublishedCited by 149 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Royal W. Hadfield, Jr. and Helen Hadfield, husband and wife, were found guilty of narcotics and firearms violations in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. They challenge their convictions on three grounds: (1) the district court’s refusal to conduct an evidentiary hearing under Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978), in respect to an affidavit supporting the first of two search warrants employed by the authorities; (2) certain evidentiary rulings at trial; and (3) sufficiency of the evidence.…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by149 opinions
- United States v. Carlos Botero-OspinaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. DavidCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Osvaldo Rodriguez-MoralesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Daniel J. LeichtnamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.