Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Estate of H. H. Coffield

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 16, 1995No. 79716PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Justice:

This is a lawsuit between the Seller and Buyers of land over the right to royalty proceeds from unrecorded coal mining leases. The parties had earlier exchanged a deed. Certain language in the deed supported Buyers’ position. The trial court refused to consider Seller’s offer of parol evidence which was at variance with the language in the deed. The court then denied Seller’s counterclaim to reform the deed, instead quieting title to the disputed mineral interest in favor of the Buyers. Seller appeals. We reverse and remand.

Here are the basic facts. The estate of H.H.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cleary Petroleum Corp. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Crockett v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Harrell v. NashSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Cinco Enterprises, Inc. v. BensoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Oncology & Hematology P.C. v. US Oncology, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. Shoemaker v. Estate of FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Amundsen v. WrightCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
  4. Cox v. Kaiser-Francis Oil Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
  5. Stroud National Bank v. OwensCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API