Legal Opinion

Cox v. Kaiser-Francis Oil Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 21, 2006No. 103487PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAROL M. HANSEN, Judge.

11 Plaintiff/Appellant, Ivy Lively Newton Cox (Grantor), seeks review of the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants/Appellees, Kaiser-Fran cis Oil Company (Kaiser), Vernon E. Faul-coner, Inc. (Faulconer), and Washita Oil and Gas, LLC (Washita) We reverse, holding the statute of limitations did not begin to run on Grantor's claim for reformation of a mineral reservation until the legal effect of the language was questioned or disputed. We find a latent ambiguity in the language of the mineral reservation arising from the undisputed fact it…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Crockett v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Maloy v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. Nelson v. DaughertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Thompson v. Estate of H. H. CoffieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McKissick v. YuenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  2. Pangaea Exploration Corp. v. RylandCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API