Legal Opinion

Shoemaker v. Estate of Freeman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 3, 1998No. 85636PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Justice.

¶ 1 This appeal is before this Court after a jury trial on the issues at law and before the judge on the issues of equitable cognizance. The parties are seeking to establish rights to royalties which accrued during a life tenancy. The issues in this case are: (1) whether a prior Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion determined as the law of the case that the plaintiffs, as remaindermen, were entitled to the accrued royalties under the terms of the will which bequeathed the life estate and the remainder interest, (2) whether the plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the doctrine of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hough v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. Hayes v. Eateries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. St. John's Hospital & School of Nursing, Inc. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  5. Fent v. Oklahoma Nat. Gas, a Div. of OneokSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Schovanec v. Archdiocese of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  2. Tibbetts v. Sight 'N Sound Appliance Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  3. In Re Baby Girl L.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. May-Li Barki, M.D., Inc. v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  5. Worsham v. NixSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API