Legal Opinion

Stroud National Bank v. Owens

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 9, 2005No. 101,122PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

ROBERT DICK BELL, Judge.

¶ 1 In this action for replevin and conversion, Defendant/Appellant Dale Owens appeals from the trial court’s order imposing a lien, ordering the sale of Owens’ 1995 Bobcat, awarding a monetary judgment and assessing a civil penalty, attorney fees and costs in favor of Plaintiff/Appellee Stroud National Bank, Stroud, Oklahoma (Wellston Branch). DefendanVAppellant Kirby Kyles appeals from the trial court’s order assessing attorney fees and costs against Kyles and in favor of Bank. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

*874I. Facts Relevant to Bank’s Action…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Hamid v. Sew OriginalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Bane v. Anderson, Bryant & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. Sisney v. SmalleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Horwitz v. DOUBENSKAIACourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
  2. Rice v. Valmont Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API