Legal Opinion
Larson v. Multnomah County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 16, 1993No. LUBA 92-100; CA A79157PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
Petitioners seek review of LUBA’s decision affirming Multnomah County’s denial of their application to develop a marina on a 21-acre parcel in an exclusive farm use zone. Although the application included several components, among them a comprehensive plan amendment, a zone change and a Goal 3 exception request, all were part of and necessary to the application for the marina use.
Petitioners’ contention before LUBA was that the denial of the application deprived them of “all economically beneficial use,” and therefore constituted a regulatory taking, in violation of the state and federal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Suess Builders Co. v. City of BeavertonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Joyce v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Dority v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boise Cascade Corp. v. State Board of ForestryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Curran v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- THUNDERBIRD HOTELS, LLC v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2009
- Murray v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Oregonians in Action v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.