Legal Opinion

MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo County

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided September 3, 1986No. 84-2015PublishedCited by 543 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

The question presented is whether rejection of a subdivision proposal deprived appellant of its property without just compensation contrary to the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.1

h — I

This appeal is taken from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to a property owner’s complaint for money damages for an alleged “taking” of its property. In 1975, appellant submitted a tentative subdivision map to the Yolo County Planning Commission. Under appellant’s proposal, the subject property, at least part of which was planted with corn, would be subdivided into 159…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by543 opinions

  1. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

538 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API