THUNDERBIRD HOTELS, LLC v. City of Portland
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
MOSMAN, District Judge.
On September 30, 2009, Magistrate Judge Jelderks issued Findings and Recommendation (“F & R”) (# 47) in the above-captioned case recommending that I GRANT defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (# 10). He recommended that I dismiss the claims against the City of Portland without prejudice and dismiss the claims against Mr. Adams with prejudice. Plaintiff filed Objections (# 49) to the F & R and defendants responded (# 50) to those objections.
DISCUSSION
Plaintiff Thunderbird Hotels, LLC (“Thunderbird”) objected to three different portions of the F & R.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bjork v. PetersDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Daniel Bell v. State of Oregon; Oregon State Corrections; Oregon Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026
- Haytham Elzayn v. Anthony Trad; Christopher Trad; Viscom Industrial Supply LLC; and Labelmax ID LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026
- Jones v. PGA Tour, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Murillo v. RamosDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.