Legal Opinion
Joyce v. Multnomah County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 22, 1992No. LUBA 91-220; CA A74663PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
LUBA affirmed Multnomah County’s denial of petitioner’s application for a conditional use permit for a non-resource dwelling in a forestry zone. Among his contentions to LUBA was that the denial deprived him of any economically viable use of his land and, therefore, violated the taking provisions of the state and federal constitutions. Or Const, Art I, § 18; US Const, Amend V, XTV. LUBA concluded that that contention was not “ripe,” because
“petitioner has sought neither quasi-judicial plan and zone map amendments, variances nor conditional use approval for uses other than a nonresource…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Suess Builders Co. v. City of BeavertonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Dunn v. City of RedmondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. AmayaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Cope v. City of Cannon BeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- THUNDERBIRD HOTELS, LLC v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2009
- Larson v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Larson v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.