Legal Opinion

Curran v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 24, 1997No. 94-4550-E-3; CA A93098PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Plaintiffs brought an action against the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) for inverse condemnation, based on a contention that ODOT had deprived them of all reasonable vehicular access from a state highway to a parcel of real property that abuts the highway. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment that granted summary judgment in favor of ODOT in the action. In conducting our review of the summary judgment, we view the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, the non-moving party. See Jones v. General Motors Corp., 325 Or 404, 408, 939 P2d 608…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Brand v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Willamette Iron Works v. Oregon Railway & Navigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1894
  4. McQuaid v. Portland & Vancouver Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Barrett v. Union Bridge Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Boise Cascade Corp. v. State Board of ForestryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Deupree v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. THUNDERBIRD HOTELS, LLC v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2009
  4. Courter v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of ForestryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API