Legal Opinion
Murray v. State of Oregon
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 21, 2005No. CC 97-12; A117707PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEITS, J. pro tempore
Defendant, State of Oregon, and intervenors, Columbia River Gorge Commission (commission) and Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. (Friends), appeal the trial court’s entry of judgment in favor of plaintiffs, Richard and Georgiana Murray, on their inverse condemnation claim. The trial court concluded that a 1994 trial court judgment effected a taking of plaintiffs’ property and awarded just compensation of $222,000 and attorney fees of $41,594.75. We reverse.
The commission is a bistate entity made up of representatives of the states of Oregon and Washington. 16 USC §…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Columbia River Gorge Commission v. Hood River CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Gordon v. RosenblumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. FriendCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Durany v. Majorie House McMinnville, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.