Legal Opinion
Oregonians in Action v. Land Conservation & Development Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 7, 1993No. 91-RA-809 CA A73503 (Control), CA A73666PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
1000 Friends of Oregon and Mark Huff (collectively “1000 Friends”), Yamhill County and Oregonians in Action (OIA) seek review of LCDC’s periodic review order, which required the county to amend its comprehensive plan and land use regulations. We affirm.
The specific requirements of the LCDC order, and of the report of the Director of the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) that LCDC’s order incorporates, included, inter alia: (1) that the county adopt an 80-acre minimum lot size for new farm parcels in addition to the 40-acre and 20-acre sizes contained in the legislation…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Forster v. Polk CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Cope v. City of Cannon BeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Urquhart v. Lane Council of GovernmentsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stamp v. Vail Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- D. S. Parklane Development, Inc. v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Caspersen v. Town of LymeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Port of St. Helens v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.