Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Mannis

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1983No. SC 29415PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue framed by the briefs and oral argument is what sanction to impose for violations of DR 9-102(A) of the Code of Professional Responsibility, which provides:

“All funds of clients paid to a lawyer or law firm, including advances for costs and expenses, shall be deposited in one or more identifiable trust accounts maintained in the state in which the law office is situated and no funds belonging to the lawyer or law firm shall be deposited therein except as follows:
“(1) Funds reasonably sufficient to pay account charges may be deposited therein.
“ (2) Funds belonging in part to a client…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint of PiersonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PhelpsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re StarrOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In Re WhippleOregon Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API