Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Smith

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1981No. OSB 79-24, SC 27739PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The Oregon State Bar filed a complaint against Hector E. Smith, a member thereof, accusing him of unethical conduct in four separate causes:(1) Improper use of a notary commission in violation of the standards of professional conduct. DR 1-102.(2) Conflict of interest and not zealously representing a client. DR 5-105 and DR 7-101 (A)(3).(3) Conversion of an automobile and failure to follow client’s instructions. DR 1-102 and DR 7-101 (A)(3).(4) That the conduct and course of conduct alleged in the first three causes, taken in the aggregate, were prejudicial to the honor and integrity of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BoivinOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KrausOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WalterOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. In Re SimsOregon Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PhelpsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BoyerOregon Supreme Court · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API