In re Libby
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, Judge
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the Primary Examiner’s rejection of claims 1,2,5, and 7 of appellant’s application, No. 154,739, for a patent on a cleaning composition. The remaining claims of the application were held to be not readable on the elected species and were not considered by the board. Accordingly they are not before us for consideration. In re Hill et al., 34 C.C.P.A. (Patents) 783, 158 F.2d 1001, 72 USPQ 263.
Claims 2, 5, and 7 are dependent upon claim 1 and are each more specific than that claim as to one…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re KeplerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- In Re GauerkeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
- In re BourdonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- In re EisenhutCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- In Re EbertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Application of Alan B. HuellmantelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Ben Jacoby, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Application of Stephen A. SzumskiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- In re TouvayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Application of Anthony J. Urbanic and Francis J. MaurerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.