Legal Opinion

Application of Ben Jacoby, Jr

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 14, 1962No. Patent Appeal 6838PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 33, 34, 35, and 41 in application Ser. No. 559,-846, filed January 18, 1956, for “Radiator.” Claims 3, 36, 37, 38, 40 and 42 stand allowed. 1

Appellant’s invention is disclosed as including two fluid-carrying “boiler pipes.” Interconnecting these pipes are a plurality of radiator core fluid-carrying conduits. The main function of the conduits is to allow for rapid heat transfer from the fluid passing therethrough, to and through the walls of the conduits and thence to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re GauerkeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  2. In re LibbyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  2. Panduit Corporation v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1969
  3. Printing Plate Supply Co. v. Crescent Engraving Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1965
  4. Holwin Corp. v. Pent Electric Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1967
  5. In Re Joan A. Davis, Robert Adell, Howard Davis, Judith A. Barnett and Serene AdellCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API