Legal Opinion

In Re Kepler

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 1, 1942No. Patent Appeal 4671PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAND, Associate Judge.

The Primary Examiner of the United States Patent.Office finally rejected claims 15, 16, 17, and 18 of appellant’s application for a patent, and on appeal the Board of Appeals affirmed the action of the examiner as to claims 16 to 18, inclusive, but allowed claim 15. Applicant has appealed here from the decision of the board affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 16 to 18, inclusive.

The invention relates to methods of forming multi-layer pressure vessels which are capable of withstanding high internal pressures and which have a number of layers consisting of…

2Cited by37 opinions

  1. Aetna Steel Products Corporation v. Southwest Products Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  2. Application of FinleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  3. In re BourdonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  4. In re EisenhutCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  5. Application of John P. Swentzel (The Carborundum Co., Assignee)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API